Its strange that you have
asked me for this as about 4 months ago I went
looking for something similar. I saw a documentary on BBC
(which is not
available on their iplayer or anywhere else for that
matter -
http://www.bbc
.co.uk/programmes/b01kxx71) about a 'landed gentry'
protestant family from
the the West of Ireland. It was a fascinating look at the
family's history
right through from the time they came into the land
(Cromwellian period)
through to Independence and up to the modern day. The
content was more
about the families social history as opposed to their
politician history
but being protestant and 'landed' it was impossible for
the documentary
maker to ignore the reality of their position and the
times. What got me
curious was a bitter reference that was made to a
Government run Forced
Land Redistribution system that was brought in by Eamonn
De Valera in the
1930s, 10 years after independence was won.
De Valera came to power in the promise of dismantling the
parts of the
treaty that he and his compatriot's did not like and he
set about achieving
this. This System of Forced Land Redistribution
however was something that
I had never heard mentioned before so I began to look into
it. What
surprised me was that I could not find any evidence of a
formally
orchestrated redistribution of land from the massive
estates owned by the
gentry at all. This is not to say that is did not happen
to some extent but
the impression I was left with was that it was not large
scale and probably
was derailed by more pressing concerns such as what became
know in Ireland
as the 'Economic War' with Britain.
What certainly did happen post independence was that the
value of
land plummeted and in certain regions a lot of the
Anglo-Irish landowners
sold up (mainly to other Anglo-Irish families as they were
the only ones
with sufficient wealth to do so) and left the country
fearing, in some
instances and regions quite rightly, for their safety.
From recollection
the Protestant population of the 26 countries dropped from
somewhere close
to 10% to 2% within 20 years. On top of this there was
massive large scale
emigration from the Catholic population many of whom had
landowning of 5 -
20 acres with that land being of the poorest quality
available. These
emigrant's often just left the land to join family members
in American and
never came back with the result that other family members
and squatters
took over what they left behind without any formal deeds
being signed.
The reason that a considerable number of native Irish
owned land before
independence was won was because of a series of Land Acts
introduced mainly
by the Liberal party (Gladstone) from the 1870s onwards as
a result of
Parliamentary pressure from C S Parnell and agrarian
agitation from a man I
particularly admire called Michael Davitt - This is the
period that you
really need to look at at this is where the formal
redistribution of land
in Ireland actually happened. What important to understand
is that although
land changed hands to some extent it was certainly not
redistributed for
free. Instead the Westminster government loaned money to
the tenants of
largely absentee landlords so they could buy the land they
had farmed for
generations from their landlords. The primary reason for
the aforementioned
'Economic War' was that De Valera put an end to these
payments which would
have continued up until the 1970s if he had not done so
and Britain
retaliated with restrictions on all Irish imports etc up
until 1938 or
thereabouts when of course the realisation that war was
imminent forced
compromise. Of course despite a significant change in land
ownership for
all the reasons mentioned above the Anglo Irish land
owning classes remain
a major economic force in Ireland up until today. Of
course large native
Irish landowners have also thrived over the past 100 years
but to many one
of the failures of the revolution was that the socialist
ideals of some of
the leaders and philosophers such as James Connolly and
James Larkin were
never realised.
Unfortunately right now to hand I cannot provide you with
any good Internet
sources but if you google for the Land Acts, Michael
Davitt, Gladstone and
Charles Stewart Parnell you will be heading in the right
direction. Diarmuid
Ferriter is also a a historian whose research you might
want to use a good
reference point as its thorough and not in my opinion
overtly biased. In
fact he seems to piss just about everyone off which can be
construed as a
good thing.
I would like to add is that for comparisons between post
colonial land
distribution Zimbabwe is an interesting model to consider
and perhaps South
Africa to a lesser extent. Mugabe has used the Irish
example of what should
not happen when a country claims its freedom (he was
educated by Irish
missionaries) and he has gone to the other extreme.
Perhaps the slow lazy
Irish approach does pay off in the end as things
eventually change .. or
perhaps in 100 years the world will look at Zimbabwe as an
example of a
country where the land went back to its people .. or at
least the cronies
who the people themselves had the misfortune to have as
their new ruling
elite as the case seems to be.
Finally.. post Celtic Tiger Ireland... people are so far
in debt to the
worlds financial hierarchies, and farm land is so
prohibitively expensive
that I really don't think there will be a major shift back
to rural
subsistence economy in the very near future. It is however
something that
could take effect in a decade or so and I for one would
welcome it. The
lack of revolutionary alternative thinking in Ireland
right now is actual
frightening.
take care now, we will be in touch soon,