Energy, Technology, Culture and Politics:

(Trying to put it all together)

Energy:

Ultimately, it is "energy" (in all its forms) that makes the "world go round" (in all its various ways).

Economics:

So, presumably, "economics" is primarily concerned with how we use physical energy (as represented nowadays by the fictional notion of "money").

Technology:

Knowledge of the physical techniques used to channel "energy" in ways desired by those who exploit it are collectively known as "technology".

Culture and Art:

....Presumably, "culture" is primarily concerned with how we use both physical and mental energy in relation to (local) group aspirations, needs and available resources.

 -Individual expressions of this are called "art".

Politics:

So politics, then becomes how politicians exploit "culture" (through "economics") for their own benifit -and "economics" is how business people exploit "energy" for their personal benifit. Then, who, or what, is responsible for organising "energy" for the benifit of the entire community -or does the "community" only exist to be exploited by individuals for personal gain? If humanity exists only to be exploited by the few -how sustainable is this exploitation? Is (individual or group) "exploitation" always a slow form of suicide?

Propaganda:

Surely, such thoughts are simple enough for the most common of people on the street to understand -but can it also be explained to "intellectuals" who have their own vested (cultural) interests?


Priorities:

Perhaps ultimately, "energy" and "culture" are more important than politics or economy. But how do you explain that to people who work politically but refuse to get too "technical" while also having no real idea of what "culture" (or "technology") really is -or what it means for culture and how it changes society?

The nanotubes stay put and function even when the fabric is stretched
The method was initially demonstrated using plain paper

The next step is to integrate the approach with materials that store more energy, in order to create more useful batteries. By combining the approach with other electronic materials in the ink, the team believes even wearable solar cells are possible.

Prof Al-Hassani has his own theory, though there are others. Science flourished in the Muslim world for so long, he believes, because it was seen as expanding knowledge in the interests of society as a whole.

But in the later Middle Ages, the Muslim world came under attack from Europeans (in the Crusades) and the Mongols (who sacked Baghdad in 1258) and the Ottoman Turks overran the remnants of the Byzantine empire, setting up a formidably centralised state.

The need for defence against external enemies combined with a strong centralised government which put less value on individuals' scientific endeavour resulted in an intellectual climate in which science simply failed to flourish, he says.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So Here is the News:
Some personal Reflections on the News:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------